Rhode Island mail-in voters don't need witnesses from white's blog

The U. S. Supreme Court on Thursday left in place [url=http://www.shopsmokingonline.com]Online Cigarettes Store USA[/url]  an agreement that allows Rhode Island residents to vote by mail in two upcoming elections without signing their ballots in the presence of two witnesses or a notary.

State officials had agreed to suspend the requirement because of the coronavirus pandemic. They have said that fulfilling the requirement results in close contact between voters [url=http://www.shopsmokingonline.com]Newport Cigarettes Shop[/url]  and others, which could expose people to the virus.

The high court rejected an effort by the Republican National Committee and the Republican Party of Rhode Island to put the agreement on hold, noting that “no state official has expressed opposition. ”

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch would have put the agreement on hold.

Rhode Island allows voters to request to vote by mail for any reason, and the coronavirus has resulted in an enormous increase in mail-in voting.

Republicans argued that witness requirements [url=http://www.shopsmokingonline.com]Newport box 100s cigarettes[/url] deter voter fraud, though elections experts say voter fraud is rare. And they said the state is already allowing 20 days of early voting that will reduce the number of people who go to the polls on Election Day and has put in place other protections for voters and poll workers. The case arose after Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo, a Democrat, in April suspended the so-called two witness requirement for the state’s June 2 presidential primary.

In July, the American Civil Liberties Union brought a lawsuit on behalf of Common Cause Rhode Island, the League of Women Voters of Rhode Island and others in an effort to extend the suspension.

State officials ultimately agreed to keep the requirement suspended for the Sept. 8 primary and Nov. 3 general election. Republicans objected, but a judge approved the agreement.

The Supreme Court noted in its brief order Thursday that the most recent election had been held without the witness requirement: “The status quo is one in which the challenged requirement has not been in effect, given the rules used in Rhode Island’s last election, and many Rhode Island voters may well hold that belief. ”.

[url=http://kengracing.com/blogs/post/2569]Online Cigarettes Store USA[/url] [url=http://www.redcasper.com/event/134]Good USA Newport Cigarettes[/url]