The OSRS gold project wouldn't from Limm's blog

Sure, the OSRS gold project wouldn't have pinpointed of bringing back strategy to weapon selection, its intentions, and it would not have bad effect. Indeed, it might have a positive impact. This route would have intended a launch in October and drawing on resources from a different project.

We can restart the project with aims. We would make sure every weapon would design openly with you, and had utility benefits. Utility benefits would be challenging to design and grow, so this could indicate a launch in February.

This would effectively be a new upgrade, so would replace a few. The project could be canceled by us. This would indicate that the projects in evolution would remain as they would acquire additional QA resource to tighten up them, and are.

What is the plan? In the end, we're unanimous as a team. The QA resource could be employed on projects that we're now working on (and likely to announce at Runefest), tightening them up and increasing our confidence in them.

This came with a caveat: we believed in the aims of Weapon Diversity, so we agreed that we would get our design group to design entirely new usefulness benefits for firearms, which might be buy runescape mobile gold introduced over time rather than in one massive clutch. For instance, a quest might have a reward of a javelin; we would take the chance to launch a javelin effect to be rolled out at the same moment for many javelins.